Labels

Showing posts with label Cleaning and Sanitation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cleaning and Sanitation. Show all posts

15.6.10

Non Chlorine Rinse for Poultry

Spray washing chicken carcasses with a solution of lauric acid and potassium hydroxide could help processors design practical and non-chlorine-based sanitisers, said the US Agricultural Research Service (ARS).

The body, which is part of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), said the work was carried out as part of its mission to develop alternatives to chlorine rinses – which are banned in the European Union. Poultry treated with chorine sanitisers have been outlawed in the EU since 1997 in what has become one of the longest-running trade disputes between the two economic powers.
Lauric acid rinse
The study – published in the International Journal of Poultry Science – found that using the cleansing solution to wash eviscerated chicken carcasses was effective in eliminating bacteria that cause human foodborne diseases.
Researchers Arthur Hinton, Jr., John Cason and R. Jeff Buhr conducted a series of tests and concluded the cleanser, comprised of lauric acid and potassium hydroxide, could be used to disinfect chicken carcasses during processing prior to chilling.
In one set of studies they found that different concentrations of the sanitiser were significant. Results showed that increasing the concentration of lauric acid to two per cent and potassium hydroxide to one percent of the solution generally removed more bacteria from the broiler carcass.
“That means that the concentration of the cleanser is an important consideration when utilising it as a sanitiser,” said the ARS. However
In another series of studies, Hinton and his colleagues used varying spray pressures (60, 100 and 150 pounds per square inch) and found that pressure did not have a significant effect on reducing bacterial contamination.
The researchers further examined the effect of time on the ability of the spray-washing to reduce bacterial contamination of carcasses. Hinton found that increasing the amount of time the carcasses were sprayed from 5 to 15 or 30 seconds resulted in significantly reduced bacterial contamination.
Addressing European concerns
The study said alkaline salts of lauric acid are soaps that can cut microbial contamination by acting as surfactants that help remove bacteria from meat surfaces. It added that since fatty acids already have GRAS status that are normally found in food, their use should not raise the same health concerns as chlorine-based washes. These substances have been banned in Europe on concerns over the formation of human carcinogens in the meat.
The 13-year EU ban on chlorine treated poultry escalated last year when the US asked the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to adjudicate on the matter. The US lost patience with its EU counterparts after a request in 2002 to lift the ban was ignored. Brussels also refused to change it stance even though the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) said in 2008 the banned chemicals were safe to use in poultry processing.
Bacteria Recovered from Whole-Carcass Rinsates of Broiler Carcasses Washed in a Spray Cabinet with Lauric Acid-Potassium Hydroxide by A. Hinton Jr., J.A. Cason, R.J. Buhr and K. Liljebjelke
Source: International Journal of Poultry Science

16.4.10

Ozone

Because ozone is a safe, powerful disinfectant, it can be used to control biological growth of unwanted organisms in products and equipment used in the food processing industries. Ozone is particularly suited to the food industry because of its ability to disinfect microorganisms without adding chemical by-products to the food being treated, or to the food processing water or atmosphere in which food are stored.

In aqueous solutions, ozone can be used to disinfect equipment, process water, and some foodstuff. In gaseous form, ozone can act as a preservative for certain foods products and can also sanitize food packaging materials. Some products currently being preserved with ozone include eggs during cold storage, fresh fruits and vegetables, and fresh fish.

Until recently, the food processing industry limited its use of ozone mainly to the treatment of bottle water and wastewater because ozone was not approved by the FDA for food applications. Recent actions, however, have cleared away some major barriers to wider applications of ozone. In 1997, through efforts of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), the FDA granted ozone with the status of "Generally Recognized As Safe" (GRAS) as a sanitizer and disinfectant for foods. EPRI accomplished this following guidelines set forth by the FDA. The process involved assembling a panel of experts on food, toxicology, and ozone to evaluate scientific and historic information on the use of ozone in food processing. The panel affirmed GRAS classification for ozone "as a sanitizer or disinfectant for foods when used at levels and by methods of application consistent with Good Manufacturing Practices." The FDA does not have to reaffirm the GRAS classification, and food processors now free to use ozone for sanitation or disinfection.

The GRAS classification for ozone was announced with a few months of the passage of a new Federal law which, for the first time, limits the presence of E. coli and Salmonella on meat and poultry. The timing of the GRAS classification is advantageous because ozone is particularly effective in inactivating these infectious agents.

Food processors and beverages manufacturers consume billions of gallons of water daily for food handling, washing, processing, and cooking and for cleaning equipment. All of this water must be free of contaminants. Even before ozone received GRAS status, the food and beverage industry had begun to recognize its potential as a disinfectant and as an alternative to chlorine, which traditionally has been used to treat food processing water. This is because ozone eliminates a problem associated with chlorine disinfection-the potential for the build-up of toxic residues of chlorine and chlorinated by-products in water that has been treated more than once.




11.4.10

Cleaning Chemiclas

Silicate product: good on fats removal, but bad on stainless steel surface. when drying, deposit is hard to remove.



When to perform Cleaning

Post-process cleaning

Pre-process cleaning

In-process cleaning

Factors Affacting Cleaning

Time

Action

Chemical Concentration

Temperature


Water

Individual

Nature of Soil

Surface to be cleaned.

How to identify fats, granse or oil on surface.







Hanging water droplets.

Greasy oily film.

Generally white appearance.

11.8.09

Food Processing Issues

- Hygiene as high TPC
- Corrosion and pitting on contact surfaces
- Chemical safety
- Staining or deposition of chemicals
- Chemical usage levels
- HACCP
- Time consuming
- Cost
- Environmental issues

Sanitization

- Steam
- Hot water
- Chemicals – effective against microbial
o Soluble in water
o Low toxicity
o Not corrosive
o Effective at low concentration
o Unaffected by water condition
o Safe
o Compatible with detergents
o Suitable for many application
o Economical
o Easy to identify

QAC – low toxic and safer
Chlorine releasing compound – rapid action 7 low cost
Amphoterics – low toxic & safer
Peracetic acid – rapid action
Alcohol –
Idophors –

Disinfection: on cleaned surface to reduce spoilage causing organism to safe level.

Typical Cleaning Process

1. Removal of gross soil
2. Pre-rinse
3. Detergent solutions
4. Mechanical action
5. Post-rinse
6. Sanitizing
7. Final rinse.

7 Factor Choosing a Detergent

- Type of soil
- Water quality
- Surface to be cleaned
- Method
- Concentration
- Temperature
- Time

Method of Cleaning:

Method of cleaning:
- Manual
- soaking
- CIP
- Foam or Gel
- Pressure

Choosing cleaning methods:
- Type of soiling
- Type of surface material
- Standard of hygiene requirement
- Type of energy required
- Cleaning schedule

Why Cleaning

2 Main Purposes of Cleaning:

- Physical: removal food soil and debries.
- Microbial: Sanitation or disinfection.